When choosing a budget smartphone, the processor plays a crucial role in determining overall performance, efficiency, and user experience. Two popular options in the entry-level category are the MediaTek Helio A22 and the MediaTek Helio G35. While both are designed for affordability, they cater to different needs—one focusing on power efficiency and the other on gaming. Understanding their differences can help you make an informed decision when buying a smartphone. Let’s dive into a detailed comparison to see which processor is the right choice for you.
Architecture and Fabrication
The Helio A22 is built on a 12nm process, while the Helio G35 uses a 12nm FinFET technology, offering better power efficiency. The A22 is a quad-core chipset featuring ARM Cortex-A53 cores, whereas the G35 has an octa-core setup with eight Cortex-A53 cores. This means the G35 has double the processing cores, allowing for better multitasking and improved overall performance. However, the A22’s simpler architecture makes it more energy-efficient, extending battery life. The G35, while more powerful, may consume more power, depending on the usage.
CPU Performance
One of the key differences between these processors lies in their clock speeds and computing capabilities. The Helio A22 features a maximum clock speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Helio G35 can reach up to 2.3 GHz. With a higher clock speed and additional cores, the G35 delivers smoother performance in demanding applications. Benchmarks indicate that the G35 scores nearly 30% higher in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the A22. If you frequently use your smartphone for productivity or gaming, the G35 is the better option.
GPU and Gaming Capabilities
The GPU is a crucial component for gaming and graphic performance, and this is where the Helio G35 takes the lead. It features a PowerVR GE8320 GPU clocked at 680 MHz, while the A22 uses the same GPU but at a lower 600 MHz clock speed. This difference means that the G35 offers better frame rates and smoother gameplay in most mobile games. Additionally, the G35 supports MediaTek’s HyperEngine technology, enhancing connectivity and in-game performance. If gaming is a priority, the Helio G35 is the superior choice.
RAM and Storage Support
When it comes to memory and storage capabilities, both processors support LPDDR3 and LPDDR4X RAM, but the G35 has an advantage. The Helio G35 can handle up to 6GB of LPDDR4X RAM, whereas the A22 maxes out at 4GB. This means that devices powered by the G35 can handle more apps in the background and provide a smoother experience. In terms of storage, both support eMMC 5.1 technology, but the higher RAM capacity of the G35 makes it better suited for power users. For those who multitask frequently, the G35 provides a more fluid experience.
AI and Camera Capabilities
Smartphone photography is greatly influenced by the chipset’s AI and ISP capabilities. The Helio A22 supports single-camera setups up to 21MP and dual-camera setups up to 13MP + 8MP. Meanwhile, the Helio G35 can support cameras up to 25MP single-lens and 13MP + 13MP dual-lens, allowing for better image processing. AI enhancements in the G35 enable features like AI bokeh, AI beautification, and enhanced HDR. If camera quality is a key factor for you, the G35 provides better imaging performance.
Vote
Who is your all-time favorite president?
Connectivity and Network Support
Both chipsets offer dual 4G VoLTE support, ensuring stable mobile connectivity. However, the Helio G35 supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), whereas the A22 only supports Wi-Fi 4, making the G35 a better option for faster internet speeds. Additionally, the G35 features Bluetooth 5.0, whereas the A22 only includes Bluetooth 4.2. These enhancements make the G35 better suited for modern connectivity needs. If you rely on fast internet and better wireless capabilities, the G35 is the preferred choice.
Battery Efficiency and Thermal Management
Efficiency is one of the strongest aspects of the Helio A22 due to its power-saving quad-core setup. Since it has fewer cores, the A22 consumes less power under normal usage, making it ideal for users who prioritize battery life. The G35, with its octa-core design, provides higher performance but also generates more heat, which can impact long-term usage. Devices with the G35 may require better cooling mechanisms to maintain consistent performance. If longevity and efficiency matter most, the Helio A22 is the better option.
Benchmark Scores and Real-World Performance
When tested under real-world conditions, the Helio G35 significantly outperforms the A22 in synthetic benchmarks. The G35 achieves an AnTuTu score of around 110,000, whereas the Helio A22 scores roughly 75,000. In Geekbench tests, the G35 also scores higher in both single-core and multi-core performance. These numbers translate to a smoother experience in gaming, app launching, and overall responsiveness. If performance is your priority, the G35 is the clear winner.
Price and Market Availability
Budget smartphones powered by the Helio A22 are typically more affordable than those using the Helio G35. Since the A22 is an older chipset, it is found in entry-level devices that prioritize battery life and basic functionality. The G35, being a more recent chipset, is found in devices that cater to budget-conscious gamers. If you’re looking for the most affordable option, the A22-powered devices are a great choice. However, if you need better performance for a slightly higher cost, the G35 is worth the extra investment.
Pros and Cons of MediaTek Helio A22
- ✅ Lower power consumption, leading to better battery life.
- ✅ Suitable for light users who don’t require high processing power.
- ✅ More affordable than the Helio G35.
- ❌ Slower GPU affects gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
- ❌ Limited to 4GB of RAM, restricting multitasking.
- ❌ Weaker camera support compared to the G35.
- ❌ Lacks modern connectivity features like Wi-Fi 5.
Watch Live Sports Now!
Dont miss a single moment of your favorite sports. Tune in to live matches, exclusive coverage, and expert analysis.
Start watching top-tier sports action now!
Watch NowPros and Cons of MediaTek Helio G35
- ✅ Better gaming performance with higher GPU clock speed.
- ✅ Supports up to 6GB of RAM, allowing better multitasking.
- ✅ Superior camera capabilities with AI enhancements.
- ❌ Consumes more power compared to the A22.
- ❌ Generates more heat under heavy loads.
- ❌ Slightly more expensive due to better performance.
- ❌ Not significantly different from the P35 in terms of specs.
Pro Tip: If you prioritize performance and gaming, go for the Helio G35, but if battery life is your main concern, the Helio A22 is the better option.
| Specification | Helio A22 | Helio G35 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores | Quad-core | Octa-core |
| Max Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 (600 MHz) | PowerVR GE8320 (680 MHz) |
“The best processor is not just about speed, but about finding the right balance between performance and efficiency.”
Ultimately, the choice between the MediaTek Helio A22 and the MediaTek Helio G35 depends on your priorities. If you need an affordable, power-efficient device, the A22 is a great choice. However, if you want a better gaming experience and improved overall performance, the G35 is the way to go. Consider how you use your smartphone daily and choose the processor that aligns with your needs. Don’t forget to bookmark this page and share it with your friends looking for the best budget processor!